Inquirer poll: 'People favor BBM over Leni in election protest'
The people are for Bongbong.
This was evident in the poll survey launched by INQUIRER.net on Thursday, February 17, after the Supreme Court refused to trash the election protest filed by Bongbong Marcos against Vice President Leni Robredo.
Gaining 140,332 likes over Robredo’s 31679 hearts, Marcos swept the survey which ran for four hours. INQUIRER clarified that their poll is not a “scientific survey” but an “interactivity tool that can, within its limits, reflect the interests of online readers.”
The Presidential Electorla Tribunal found Marcos’ complaint to be “sufficient in form and substance.” The PET’s eight-page resolution declared that Marcos’ petition is within its jurisdiction as mandated by the 1987 Constitution.
INQUIRER reported that Robredo’s counterstatement said that the PET had no jurisdiction over the protest because it “improperly questions the authenticity and due execution of the Certificates of Canvass (COC).”
In defense, the PET cited Section 4 Article VII of the Constitution in relation to Rule 13 of the PET rules saying, “the Tribunal shall be sole judge of all contests relation to the election, returns and qualifications of the President and Vice President of the Philippines.”
It has been almost a year since Marcos files his protest claiming that he was cheated on in the automated elections. He asked the PET to annul around a million votes for Robredo from Lanao del Sur, Basilan, and Maguindanao.
Source: Inquirer
This was evident in the poll survey launched by INQUIRER.net on Thursday, February 17, after the Supreme Court refused to trash the election protest filed by Bongbong Marcos against Vice President Leni Robredo.
 |
| Photo by D-cal |
The Presidential Electorla Tribunal found Marcos’ complaint to be “sufficient in form and substance.” The PET’s eight-page resolution declared that Marcos’ petition is within its jurisdiction as mandated by the 1987 Constitution.
INQUIRER reported that Robredo’s counterstatement said that the PET had no jurisdiction over the protest because it “improperly questions the authenticity and due execution of the Certificates of Canvass (COC).”
In defense, the PET cited Section 4 Article VII of the Constitution in relation to Rule 13 of the PET rules saying, “the Tribunal shall be sole judge of all contests relation to the election, returns and qualifications of the President and Vice President of the Philippines.”
It has been almost a year since Marcos files his protest claiming that he was cheated on in the automated elections. He asked the PET to annul around a million votes for Robredo from Lanao del Sur, Basilan, and Maguindanao.
Source: Inquirer
Love this article? Sharing is caring!
Inquirer poll: 'People favor BBM over Leni in election protest'
Reviewed by Kristian S.
on
17 February
Rating:
Reviewed by Kristian S.
on
17 February
Rating:
No comments:
Share your thoughts here...